Your competency desk
Choose your regulator profile, add your experience records and validators, then write one Situation, Action and Outcome for each competency against the character limit.
Competency Desk does not determine your assessment outcome; the regulator's assessors decide. Competency Desk never writes, rewrites or suggests example text. There is no AI, no phrase bank and no autocomplete: every word is yours. New to the process? Read how the competency assessment works or how to structure a Situation, Action and Outcome.
Competencies
34 competencies in 7 categories. Open one to write its Situation, Action and Outcome. Counts update as you type and nothing is ever written for you.
1. Technical competence (average of at least 3)
1.1 Regulations, codes and standardsNot started
Working knowledge of the codes, standards and regulations that govern your work, Canadian or an international counterpart, shown by using them in a real decision.
Minimum rating 3 (professional standards competency).
What a strong example for 1.1 contains
- Names the specific code, standard or regulation and the edition you worked to
- Shows a decision the document changed, not only that you knew it existed
- For work outside Canada, names the Canadian document that plays the same role
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 3 (professional standards competency).1.2 Technical and design constraintsNot started
Recognising the limits a design has to live within, such as materials, operations, cost, time and other disciplines, and shaping the design to fit them.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 1.2 contains
- States the constraints plainly and says which one governed
- Shows how another discipline's needs affected your choice
- Ends with how the design you chose met the constraints
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.1.3 Risk management for technical workNot started
Finding technical risks, their causes and their consequences, and putting measures in place to reduce them, kept separate from general public safety.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 1.3 contains
- Separates the technical risk from general safety matters
- Names the cause and the consequence you assessed
- Describes the mitigation you set up and whether it worked
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.1.4 Application of theoryNot started
Using engineering theory and calculation to arrive at a design or a technical solution.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 1.4 contains
- Names the method, theory or calculation you used
- Shows that the numbers drove the decision
- Says where a standard approach fell short, if it did
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.1.5 Solution techniques and results verificationNot started
Understanding the method behind a result, including software output, and checking that result independently before it is relied on.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 1.5 contains
- Names the tool or method that produced the result
- Describes the independent check: hand calculation, field data or a test
- Says what the check showed and what you did about it
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.1.6 Safety awarenessNot started
Knowing the safety rules that apply to your work and building safety into design, operation, maintenance and site activity.
Minimum rating 3 (professional standards competency).
What a strong example for 1.6 contains
- Names the safety regulation or standard that applied
- Shows a hazard you identified and the control you chose
- Ties the control back to the rule that required it
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 3 (professional standards competency).1.7 Systems and their componentsNot started
Understanding how the parts of a technical system interact and limit each other, and managing the system to get the result wanted.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 1.7 contains
- Describes the system and the part you worked on
- Explains an interaction or a limit between components
- Shows a monitoring or adjustment step you took yourself
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.1.8 Project and process life cycleNot started
Exposure to the stages of a project or asset, from the first idea and feasibility through design, delivery, operation and retirement.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 1.8 contains
- Names the stages you took part in
- Shows your own role at each stage, not the project's history
- Notes how one stage's findings fed the next
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.1.9 Peer review and quality controlNot started
Using checks, peer review and quality systems to confirm engineering work is right before anyone relies on it.
Minimum rating 3 (professional standards competency).
What a strong example for 1.9 contains
- Names the quality process or review you ran or followed
- Shows a finding that came out of a check or a review
- Says how the work was corrected or confirmed as a result
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 3 (professional standards competency).1.10 Engineering documentationNot started
Turning design intent into drawings, specifications and reports, and reviewing documents that others prepared.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 1.10 contains
- Names the documents you produced or reviewed
- Shows how a document carried a design decision to someone else
- Mentions a review, an approval or a comment you resolved
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.
2. Communication (average of at least 3)
2.1 Oral communicationNot started
Explaining technical and non-technical matters clearly out loud to colleagues, clients, contractors or members of the public.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 2.1 contains
- Names the audience and the setting
- Shows how you adapted what you said for that audience
- States what the audience did or decided afterward
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.2.2 Written communicationNot started
Writing technical documents, memos and reports that suit the person who has to read them.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 2.2 contains
- Names the document and who it was for
- Shows a choice you made because of that reader
- Says how the document was used
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.2.3 Reading and comprehensionNot started
Reading technical material such as specifications, standards or contracts, working out what it requires, and acting on it.
Minimum rating 3 (professional standards competency).
What a strong example for 2.3 contains
- Names the document you read
- States what it required that was not obvious on a first read
- Shows the action that followed from your reading
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 3 (professional standards competency).
3. Project and financial management (average of at least 2)
3.1 Project management principlesNot started
Awareness of scope, schedule, budget, resources and change on a project, and of what internal and external clients expect.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 3.1 contains
- Names the project management element you handled
- Shows a trade-off between scope, time and cost
- States the result for the project
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.3.2 Level of responsibilityNot started
Taking on growing responsibility for planning and carrying out project work over time.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 3.2 contains
- Shows where your responsibility grew compared with earlier work
- Names the planning task you owned
- States what you delivered
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.3.3 Expectations versus resourcesNot started
Keeping schedule and budget expectations realistic for the people, money and materials actually available.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 3.3 contains
- States the resource limit you faced
- Shows how you reported the position or reset expectations
- Says whether the deadline or the budget held
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.3.4 Finances and budgetsNot started
Understanding the money side of engineering work: budgets, estimates, cost comparisons, business cases and contracts.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 3.4 contains
- Names the budget, estimate or cost comparison
- Shows a figure that influenced a decision
- States the financial outcome
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.3.5 Response to feedbackNot started
Asking for feedback, accepting criticism, and changing course when feedback or a scope change calls for it.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 3.5 contains
- Names the feedback you received and who gave it
- Shows what you changed as a result
- States how the change worked out
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.
4. Team effectiveness (average of at least 3)
4.1 Working respectfully with othersNot started
Working respectfully with people from other disciplines and bringing their input into your engineering work.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 4.1 contains
- Names the other disciplines or roles involved
- Shows how their input changed your work
- States the result for the team
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.4.2 Resolving differencesNot started
Helping a team through a disagreement toward a shared goal.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 4.2 contains
- Describes the disagreement without blaming anyone
- Shows the steps you took to resolve it
- States how the team moved forward
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.
5. Professional accountability (average of at least 3)
5.1 Code of ethicsNot started
Applying the professional code of ethics in your jurisdiction, or its international counterpart, to a real decision at work.
Minimum rating 3 (professional standards competency).
What a strong example for 5.1 contains
- Names the ethical question you faced
- Links your action to a principle of the code
- States the outcome and who it protected
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 3 (professional standards competency).5.2 Awareness of limitationsNot started
Knowing where your competence ends and asking for help, guidance or review when you reach that point.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 5.2 contains
- Names the limit you recognised
- Shows who you went to and what you asked for
- States how the work improved
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.5.3 Conflict of interestNot started
Recognising a real or perceived conflict of interest and handling it properly.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 5.3 contains
- Describes the conflict or the potential conflict
- Shows how you disclosed it or stepped away from it
- States the result
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.5.4 Professional accountabilityNot started
Understanding that engineers answer for their work through design, construction and inspection.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 5.4 contains
- Names where accountability arose in your work
- Shows a step you took because of it
- States what that step protected
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.5.5 Use of stamp and sealNot started
Understanding when an engineer's stamp or seal may be applied and what applying it means.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 5.5 contains
- Names the document that was sealed and who sealed it
- Shows your part in preparing it for sealing
- States a sealing rule you observed
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.5.6 Strengths and weaknessesNot started
Knowing your own strengths and weaknesses and how they affect the work you do.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 5.6 contains
- Names a strength and a weakness honestly
- Shows where the weakness showed up at work
- States the step you took about it
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.
6. Social, economic, environmental and sustainability (average of at least 2)
6.1 Public impacts and safeguardsNot started
Knowing the safeguards that protect the public and the ways to reduce a project's harm, including effects of a changing climate.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 6.1 contains
- Names the public impact you considered
- Shows the safeguard or mitigation you applied
- States the result for the public
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.6.2 Engineering and the publicNot started
Understanding how engineering work benefits and affects the public, and responding to public concerns.
Minimum rating 2 (professional standards competency).
What a strong example for 6.2 contains
- Names who in the public was affected
- Shows how their concerns or the benefit to them shaped your work
- States the result
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 2 (professional standards competency).6.3 Role of regulatory bodiesNot started
Understanding why regulators and neighbouring professions exist and how they shape engineering practice, including regional and Indigenous requirements.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 6.3 contains
- Names the regulatory body or the overlapping profession
- Shows how its role affected your work
- Explains why that oversight mattered
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.6.4 Sustainability and practice guidelinesNot started
Awareness of the sustainability provisions in the practice guidelines that apply to your field.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 6.4 contains
- Names the guideline or provision
- Shows how you applied it
- States the effect
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.6.5 Promotion of sustainabilityNot started
Considering sustainable options in your own engineering work and making the case for them.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 6.5 contains
- Names the sustainable option you considered
- Shows how you argued for it or applied it
- States the effect over the life of the work
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.
7. Personal continuing professional development (average of at least 3)
7.1 Professional development activitiesNot started
Taking part in formal and self-directed learning and in professional or technical activities.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 7.1 contains
- Names the activities and when they happened
- Shows why you chose them
- States how you used what you learned
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.7.2 Identifying training needsNot started
Recognising the gaps in your knowledge and skills that need development.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 7.2 contains
- Describes how you found the gap
- Names the gap specifically
- States why it matters for your role
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.7.3 Professional development planNot started
Having a plan to close your knowledge gaps and stay current in your field, and following it.
Minimum rating 1.
What a strong example for 7.3 contains
- Names the plan's main items and their timing
- Links each item to a gap you identified
- Shows progress against the plan
- Written in the first person about work you did yourself, with enough detail for someone who has never seen the project.
A structure to check your own draft against. The desk never writes or suggests example text.
The context: the project or task, and the problem you faced.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
What you did, how and why. Usually the longest part. Write I, not we.0 of 1,650 characters, including spaces
The result of your actions and what it changed.0 of 300 characters, including spaces
Minimum rating 1.